Last Wednesday, I had the opportunity to sit in on, participate in and document a training session for the MCA's Artist Guides (AGs), the corps of practicing studio artists who lead conversation-based tours for school groups throughout the academic year. The training was fantastic, in that I got to meet most of the AGs and hear them talk about their art, how leading school tours fits into it, and their unique role within the greater institution.
During the latter half of the morning session, Marissa Reyes, Associate Director of Education, School and Teacher Programs, rolled out the MCA's freshly crafted vision statement, which serves as a complement to the museum's mission statement by stating not what the MCA is but what it aspires to be. AGs, staff, and myself then broke up into small groups to parse out particularly complicated sections of the statement, and came back together as a large group to share insights and come to a collective understanding of the vision's meaning through the lens of the AGs' work with students.
Part of the vision statement refers the MCA as an "audience-engaged platform for producing art, ideas, community, and conversation around the creative process." A common question among AGs was: How do we make our students self-confident enough to become truly engaged? One AG, Alex, noted that when you come into a museum, you're essentially a human being, flesh and bones, in a building, looking at stuff. How can we help others make something more from that "stuff," when it also means taking the risk of making mistakes? Rachel Harper suggested that in order to do that, we need to set up boundaries to keep the space safe and allow students to push up against those boundaries. Marissa suggested building empathy toward one's students by using oneself as a starting point.
Something else that came up was the necessity of encouraging kids to share their negative reactions toward pieces of art. The guides talked about their experience with a Richard Serra sculpture in an exhibit a few years ago, and how students hated it when they first saw it, but how after engaging with it, many of them changed their minds. The group agreed that certain works of art are valuable within tours for their ability to turn kids off, and that those works serve as great icebreakers.
Today, I was talking with another AG about the Minimalism show that's going up on Saturday, which will be the site of the bulk of fall school tours. She expressed her excitement for it, and her particular interest in leading high school students through it. "Because they'll understand the conceptual part of it better?" I asked. "Because it's going to piss them off," she replied.
People talk about art as a thing of beauty, of cultural and significance, as an emotional force or a historical object, but I like art best when it pisses people off. Because what makes them angry, makes them talk, and when people talk -- especially passionately -- they learn.
